CLICK HERE FOR ROTHCHILD AND OBAMA- AIG SCHENE TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES

PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 2009 thru to 2012- ASSAULT, BATTERY, WIRE FRAUD, ETC. AND

ON OR ABOUT 2008 AND CONTINUING THRU TO 2017

BRIDGEWATER VS. VERSES HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

-CLICK HERE-

CONTINUING THRU TO 2016

​

​

​

​

​

2016 PRESIDENTIAL

ELECTION - ELECTIONS, CLINTON, TRUMP, PUTIN, MUELLER, FRAUD ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND THE TWO WITNESSES, FAKE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION, ETC.  

​

2017 

(UNITEDS STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

​

ON OR ABOUT BRIDGEWATER VS. LYNCH (UNITEDS STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1:2017cv00169

Ketanji Brown Jackson(from U.S. District Court and/or U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. Circuit) knowingly, willfully, intentionally ADOPTED THE ACTS OF U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGES FOR THE entered into an unlawful agreement with one or more of the following Judges conspired under the color of law denied and/or deprived both Sharon Bridgewawerissued one or more "void fraudulant Judgment in the U.S. District of Columbia Circuit 

​

On July 5, 2019 Merrick Garland in his official capacity as Judge for D.C. Circuit entered into an unlawful agreement with

Donald Trump, William Barr, Putin et al knowingly, intentionally, willfully

• committed one or more the the following acts "criminal overt acts" in

• Sharon Bridgewater

• Respondent:Donald J. Trump and William P. Barr

• Case Number:19-1141

• ​​

•  

-CLICK HERE- 

OVERT ACT TO ADVANCE THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRIZE JACKSON NOMINATED AND/OR APPOINTED TO SUPREME COURT TO ISSUE "NULL AND VOID" JUDGMENT ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. DONAL TRUMP(AND/OR BIDEN, OR HARRIS) VIA FRAUD ON THE COURT AND IDENTITY THEFT!!

​

K. BROWN JACKSON, PROMOTED FROM D.C. CIRUIT WHERE SHE ISSUED ONE OR MORE "VOID JUDGMENTS" ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER V. DONALD TRUMP AND PROMOTED TO U.S. COURT OF APPEAS TO FURTHER COMMIT FRUAD, AND TO SUPREME CURT TO AID, ABET GCUIT

​

ABUSE O PU

​

​

GARLAND PROMOTED TO GARLD AND TRUMP PROMOTED TO THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - ATTORNEY GENERAL TO "EXTORT" MONWY FROM CORPORATIONS AND INDIVIDUAL BASED ON HIS ON FRAUD ON THE COURT IN THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS D.C. CIRCUIT

conspired with Donald Trump

Ketanji Brown Jackson Supreme ISSUED ONE OR MORE JUDGMENT IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF COLUMBIA AND/OR U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ENTITLED SHARONBRIDGEWATER VS. DONALD TRUMP, AND TO ADVANCE THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRIZE OBJECTIVE SHE IS PROMOTED TO SUREME COURT TO ISSUE "NULL AND VOID JUDGMENTS ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. TRUMP

OVERT RACKETEERING CRIMINAL ACT OF K.B.JACKSON Court NOMINEE AND/OR SUPREME COURT JUDGE(AN AFRICAN S

proof of service #1

proof of service #2 

proof of service #3

proof of service#4

employed by or associated with an enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, and conducted or participated, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise's affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962(c) and is guilty of racketeering conspiracy and conspiracy to commit Treason, 

GUILTY OF CONSPIRING WITH JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, HER COLLEGUE MERRICK GARLAND U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL AND DONALD TRUMP

CASE # https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/cadc/19-1141

AND SUPREME COURT HEARING A CASE ENTITLED

SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. DONALD TRUMP

UNDER SEAL WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW(SEE BELOW)COMMITTED FRAUD(SEE RECEIVED TWO OR MORE LETEERS FROM BRIDGEWATER)MADE INTENTIOAL MISREPRESENAT COMMITTED AN OVERT ACT BY ACCEPTING THE POSITION AS SUPREME COURT JUDGE TO ADVANCE THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRIZE TO ISSUE MORE NULL AND VOID JUDGMENTS FOR $125 TRILLION DOLLARS TO AID, ABET ALL OTHER SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, BIDEN, HARRIS

​

​

DECLARTORY JUDGMENT - PURSUANT TO "COMMON LAW" IS A CRIMINAL ENTEPRIZE AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1961- RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION

Congress enacted the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ("RICO") statute in 1970 to limit the infiltration of organized crime into legitimate business organizations.  To this end, RICO criminalizes participation in a "pattern of racketeering activity" in the context of an "enterprise."

A pattern of racketeering activity consists of at least two federal or state crimes, as specified in the statute,  that have "similar purposes, results, participants, victims, or methods of commission"5 and "amount to or pose a threat of continued criminal activity." An enterprise is broadly defined as "any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity AND through the commission of racketeering activity, the defendant "directly or indirectly invested in, or maintained an interest in, or participated in" the enterprise.
 

​

must show that the racketeering predicates are related, and that they amount to or pose a threat of continued criminal activity. Id. Racketeering predicates are related if they have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims, or methods of commission, or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated events. (1) that an enterprise existed; (2) that the enterprise affected interstate commerce; (3) that the defendant was associated with or employed by the enterprise; (4) that the defendant engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity; and (5) that the defendant conducted or participated in the conduct of the enterprise through that pattern of racketeering activity through the commission of at least two acts of racketeering activity as set forth in the indictment. United States v. Phillips, 664 F. 2d 971, 1011 (5th Cir. Unit B Dec. 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136, 102 S. Ct. 1265, 73 L. Ed. 2d 1354 (1982).

An "enterprise" is defined as including any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity. The acts and/or omissions of the Criminal enterprise "constitute multiple people acting joint participation in an conspiracy to retailate against both witnesses and constitute an overlapping conspiracy!" ALL EXECUTIVE ORDER'S NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!(seven more more mailicous evictions) in retailaton

"THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(MINORITY REAL ESTATE BUSNESS OWNERS) VS. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL!!

The Controversy between ONE OR MORE Joe Biden in his official capacity as President and/or individually Merrick Garland in his official capacity as United States Attorney General mAt all times mentioned Merrick Garland in his official capacity as Chief Judge for the U.S. Circuit Court of Appealsember of Congress, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, either before or after such official has qualified, or an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency or branch of Government thereof, including the District of Columbia, in any official function, under or by authority of any such department, agency, or branch of Government, or a juror 18 U.S.C. 201(a)(1)and is and was at all times herein mentioned, qualified to do business in "the 50 States," with duties as follows:  -click here- . 

Putin, Macron, Merkel, “foreign official” means any officer or employee of a foreign government or any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof, or of a public international organization, or any person acting in an official capacity for or on behalf of any such government or department, agency, or instrumentality, or for or on behalf of any such public international organization. (B) For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term “public international organization” means— (i) an organization that is designated by Executive order pursuant to section 288 of title 22 ; or (ii) any other international organization that is designated by the President by Executive order for the purposes of this section, effective as of the date of publication of such order in the Federal Register.  Microsoft, Twitter, Meta(formally facebook), Google is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business in Washington, D.C. which is located in the District of Columbia.  Merrick Garland in his official capacity as United States Attorney General  is public official 

​

MERRICK GARLAND CONTENDS THAT HE IS THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, At all times mentioned Merrick Garland in his official capacity as Chief Judge for the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

"PROTECTS AMERICA, THE CITIZENS OF THE 50 STATES

​

​

WHEREAS SHARON BRIDGEWATER VIA PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL  CONTENDS THAT SHE REPRESENTS HERSELF, HER SON AND THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES" AND/OR AMERICA "ACT AS JUDGE, PROSECUTOR AND/OR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

​

​

​

​

 

3. Jurisdiction is proper pursuant to  "universal jursidiction, 

​

Extraterritorial jurisdiction, via the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) conduct that occurs outside of the United States for foreign Officials, one or more forign Corrupt Practice Act, war crimes, violation of the Nuremberg Code, crimes against humanity, money laundering (and/or pursuant to  n conspiracy(E.U. with one or more Donald Trump and Supreme Court Justice and Merrick Garland 

 wire fraud, mail fraud, scheme to defraud two witnesses of 125 Trillion Dollars, coronavirus 

​

Extraterritorial jurisdiction, admiralty and/or maritime jurisdiction “admiralty and maritime jurisdiction”  arising upon the high seas, whereas “admiralty” meant primarily cases of a local nature involving police regulations of shipping, harbors, fishing, and the like. A long struggle between the admiralty and common law courts had, however, in the course of time resulted in a considerable curtailment of English admiralty jurisdiction. A much broader conception of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction existed in the United States at the time of the framing of the Constitution than in the Mother Country.899 At the very beginning of government under the Constitution, Congress conferred on the federal district courts exclusive original cognizance “of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, including all seizures under laws of impost, navigation or trade of the United States, where the seizures are made, on waters which are navigable from the sea by vessels of ten or more tons burthen, within their respective districts as well as upon the high seas; saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it . . . .as in this case!!

​

DECLARE THAT"THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR  I AM DIRECTOR OVER ALL FEDERAL AGENCIES, PRESIDNET OF THE UNITED STATES, U.S. ATTRONEY GENERAL, OWNER FEDERAL RESERVE, ALL BANKS 

in the State of California and within this district, including contracts with California corporations and the advertising and sale of its products through the Internet to California residents. 5. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and 1391(c). 6. An actual case or controversy has arisen between the parties. 

​

​

CLICK HERE FOR ROTHCHILD AND OBAMA- AIG SCHENE TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES

PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 2009 thru to 2012- ASSAULT, BATTERY, WIRE FRAUD, ETC.

​

​

​

​

​

​

On July 5, 2019 Merrick Garland in his official capacity as Judge for D.C. Circuit entered into an unlawful agreement with

Donald Trump, William Barr, Putin et al knowingly, intentionally, willfully

• committed one or more the the following acts "criminal overt acts" in

• Sharon Bridgewater

• Respondent:Donald J. Trump and William P. Barr

• Case Number:19-1141

• ​

•  

•  

•  

•  

•  

•  

•  

•  

•  

• used my name Sharon Bridgewater(aggreviated identiTy theft in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1028A.) in the above case possessed, obtained, accepted, or received, provided a forged, counterfeit, altered, or falsely made document inorder to satisfy the requirement("procedural due process")to obain U.S. Supreme Court Jurisidcition to obain 125 Trillion Dollars(money and/or property without due process of law) any requirement of this chapter or to obtain a benefit and also committed one or more:

• FRAUD ON THE COURT- directed at the “judicial machinery” itself.

• 1.Fraud in the service of court summons, such as withholding a court summons from an entitled party;

• 2. Corruption or influence of a court member or official, such as bribery;

• 3. Judicial fraud;

• 4. Knowingly, Intentionally failed to inform the parties of necessary appointments or requirements, as an effort to impede the judicial process; and/or

• 5. Schemes considered to be unconscionable, as they attempt to deceive or make misrepresentations through the court system.

• 6.

It is important to note that fraud on the court only involves court officials, or officers of the court, such as judges or court-appointed attorneys. The fraudulent activity must be directed at the “judicial machinery” itself. As such, fraud on the court generally does not mean:

• Fraudulent activity between the two opposing parties;

• The submission of fraudulent documents; and

• Perjury or false statements made by witnesses.

Aggravated Identity Theft?
On July 15, 2004, President Bush signed into law the “Identity Theft Penalty Enhancement Act,”
Public Law 108-275. The law is codified at 18 U.S.C. §1028A. Under this statute it is a crime to
knowingly transfer, possess, or use, without lawful authority, a means of identification of
another person, during and in relation to any felony violation of certain enumerated
Federal felony offenses.It is unlawful for any person or entity knowingly—

(2)
to use, attempt to use, possess, obtain, accept, or receive or toprovide any forged, counterfeit, altered, or falsely made document inorder to satisfy any requirement of this chapter or to obtain a benefitunder this chapter,
(3)
to use or attempt to use or to provide or attempt to provide anydocument lawfully issued to or with respect to a person other than thepossessor (including a deceased individual) for the purpose of satisfyinga requirement of this chapter or obtaining a benefit under this chapter,
(4)
to accept or receive or to provide any document lawfully issued toor with respect to a person other than the possessor (including adeceased individual) for the purpose of complying with
section1324a(b) of this title
or obtaining a benefit under this chapter, or 8 U.S. Code § 1324c - Penalties for document fraud18 U.S.C. § 1001 (relating to false statements or entries generally),
18 U.S.C. § 1035 (relating to false statements relating to health care matters),
18 U.S.C. § 1347 (relating to health care fraud)
18 U.S.C. § 1343 (relating to wire fraud)
18 U.S.C. § 1341 (relating to mail fraud)
Category #2: Approximately 50 Federal felony terrorism-related predicate offenses.
The second category of Aggravated Identity Theft involves situations where identity theft allegedly
takes place during and in relation to one of approximately 50 Federal felony terrorism-related
offenses, [3] a violation of which will result in a mandatory minimum of five years imprisonment.
To date, the government has not been very aggressive in pursuing these charges in terrorismrelated
prosecutions

California. Google provides Internet search engine services to Internet users and advertising services to individuals, businesses and educational and governmental entities involved in Internet sales and marketing, including numerous individuals and entities within the jurisdiction of this Court. 2. Defendant American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc. d/b/a decoratetoday.com, Inc. (“American Blind”), is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. Based on information and belief, American Blind is engaged in the business of selling blinds, wallpaper, curtains, bedding, lighting and other furnishings and accessories related t

GENERAL ALLEGATIONS I. Google’s Keyword-Triggered Advertising 7. Google’s free Internet search engine is the most widely-used Internet search engine in the world. It answers hundreds of millions of user searches and covers billions of web pages each day. 8. Google also sells a number of products and services to individuals and business, educational and governmental entities. One of the programs Google offers to its business customers is a keyword-triggered advertising program entitled “AdWords.” Google has offered this program since October 2000. 9. Google’s AdWords program permits Google’s advertising customers to purchase advertising links associated with certain keywords. Google posts the links on the margins of its search engine results pages based on whichever keywords appear in user queries posted to Google’s Internet search engine. Google’s advertising customers pay Google based on the number of Internet users who click on these advertising links. 10. Google’s advertisers, not Google, select the keywords that will trigger their advertisements. Thus, for example, a computer hardware retailer might select keywords such as “computer,” “hard drive,” “memory,” and the like. Then, whenever a user entered a search string containing any of those keywords, that retailer’s paid advertisement would appear alongside the search results. II. The Present Dispute 11. On July 23, 2002, Google received a letter from Susan Greenspon, an attorney at Kelley Drye & Warren LLP (“Kelly Drye”), counsel to American Blind. A copy of that letter is attached as Exhibit A hereto. Ms. Greenspon claimed that several of American Blind’s competitors “have purchased advertising keywords from Google that are identical or substantially similar to [American Blind’s] registered trademarks.” Ms. Greenspon claimed that American Blind is the registered owner of the following trademarks listed with the United States

​

Misprision of treason, Seditious Conspiracy, Rackeeteering Conspiracy(, Conspiracy  to defraud the United States of America by incorporating the U.S.A. with China Russia, Communist U.S. Citizens and destroy America two witnesses 2021 United States Capitol attacks, ELECTION FRAUD, ETC.

​

Sharon and/or James S.Bridgewater by AND Predecessors,(ILLEGAL RESTRAINTS IN TRADE, HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, ETC.  The two witneseses Sharon Bridgewater and/or James S. Bridgewater

-click here for Sharon and James S. Bridgewater background-

at all times mentioned are U.S. Citizens with guaranteed U.S. Constitutional rights as defined in the Bill of Rights and/or under the 14th amendment

​

 KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, IS WORKING WITH DONALD TRUMP" CONTINUE TO "LIE" SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. § 2384, 18 U.S. Code § 2381TREASON, PMLIED" TO U.S. CITIZENS, AND CONTINUE TO "LIE" SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. § 2384, 18 U.S. Code § 2381TREASPMSeditious conspiracing to CONSPIRING TO INCLUDE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA(AND/OR THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WITH THE "NEW ONE WORLD ORDER AS MENTIONED BY GEORGE H. BUSCH SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. § 2384, 18 U.S. Code § 2381 TREASON,

MISPRISONMENT OF TREASON IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2382 -

CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. § & RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY(HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE, MONEY LAUNDERINGFRAUD, DECEPTION/ CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD TWO SOCIO (ONEDISABLED)ATTEMPTED, MAKE INTENTIONAL MISREPRESEANTATION TO HUMANITY ABO9UT THE COV-19 VACCINE, CONSPIRACY CHINAUPON INFORMATIONB AND BELIEF UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL CONSPIRES WITH CHINA TO UNLEASHE virus might have escaped from a Chinese government lab in Wuhan(SIMILAR TO THE CHINA/OBAMA JOINT P PARTRICIPATION OF THE  HINIVIRUS-"TERUN" CLICK HERE

​

​

​

(ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS)

without due process of law(AND FAILED BROKE NAKED CLOWNS THAT EXHAUSTED ALL REMEDIES AND CURRENTLY CONSPIRES WITH NOMINEE AND/OR SUPREME COURT JUSTICE SEEK Ketanji Brown Jackson TO COMMIT MORE FRAUD, SHE IS GUILTY OF RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY se of the mail for the purpose of executing, or attempting to execute, the scheme (or specified fraudulent acts)scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services in violaton of USC section 18 U.S. Code § 1346..or devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, rep

THREE STIMULUS CHECKS (WITH THE PRESIDENT SIGNATURE OF EACH STIMULUS CHECK(CRIMINAL VIOLATION) TO SETTLE

OTHER SCHEME(S) AND SCAMS BY GOV. WITHMER

CLICK HERE FOR  MEASURES  TO PREVENT U.S.

conspiring with Donald Trump, and ONE OR MORE Valdmir Putin, COMMITTED ELECTION FRAUD

​

UKRAINE/RUSSIA WAR FRAUD

They sought to overturn his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, THE FRAUD PERPUTRATED ON THE TWO WITNESSES VIOLATIONS OF THE NUMBERGU - CORONAVIRUS FRAUD, all knew and were aware they committed fraud on the court, racketeering conspiracy to defraud two witnesses of 125 trillion "perputrated a Fake Ukraine/Russian War "to distant themselves from one or more Trump, Putin and the capitol attac

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

conspiring with Donald Trump and ONE OR MORE Valdmir Putin, XI JINPING AND RESPONSIBLE FOR THE On January 6, 2021, a mob of 2,000–2,500 supporters of U.S. President Donald Trump attacked the Capitol Building in Washington, D.C.[a][28][29] They sought to overturn his defeat in the 2020 presidential election, THE FRAUD PERPUTRATED ON THE TWO WITNESSES VIOLATIONS OF THE NUMBERGU - CORONAVIRUS FRAUD, all knew and were aware they committed fraud on the court, racketeering conspiracy to defraud two witnesses of 125 trillion "perputrated a Fake Ukraine/Russian War "to distant themselves from one or more Trump, Putin and the capitol attac

​

​

​